3 research outputs found
Monte Carlo-based Noise Compensation in Coil Intensity Corrected Endorectal MRI
Background: Prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer found
in males making early diagnosis important. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has
been useful in visualizing and localizing tumor candidates and with the use of
endorectal coils (ERC), the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be improved. The
coils introduce intensity inhomogeneities and the surface coil intensity
correction built into MRI scanners is used to reduce these inhomogeneities.
However, the correction typically performed at the MRI scanner level leads to
noise amplification and noise level variations. Methods: In this study, we
introduce a new Monte Carlo-based noise compensation approach for coil
intensity corrected endorectal MRI which allows for effective noise
compensation and preservation of details within the prostate. The approach
accounts for the ERC SNR profile via a spatially-adaptive noise model for
correcting non-stationary noise variations. Such a method is useful
particularly for improving the image quality of coil intensity corrected
endorectal MRI data performed at the MRI scanner level and when the original
raw data is not available. Results: SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)
analysis in patient experiments demonstrate an average improvement of 11.7 dB
and 11.2 dB respectively over uncorrected endorectal MRI, and provides strong
performance when compared to existing approaches. Conclusions: A new noise
compensation method was developed for the purpose of improving the quality of
coil intensity corrected endorectal MRI data performed at the MRI scanner
level. We illustrate that promising noise compensation performance can be
achieved for the proposed approach, which is particularly important for
processing coil intensity corrected endorectal MRI data performed at the MRI
scanner level and when the original raw data is not available.Comment: 23 page
Separating Technological and Clinical Safety Assurance for Medical Devices
The safety and clinical effectiveness of medical devices are closely
associated with their specific use in clinical treatments. Assuring safety and
the desired clinical effectiveness is challenging. Different people may react
differently to the same treatment due to variability in their physiology and
genetics. Thus, we need to consider the outputs and behaviour of the device
itself as well as the effect of using the device to treat a wide variety of
patients. High-intensity focused ultrasound systems and radiation therapy
machines are examples of systems in which this is a primary concern.
Conventional monolithic assurance cases are complex, and this complexity
affects our ability to address these concerns adequately. Based on the
principle of separation of concerns, we propose separating the assurance of the
use of these types of systems in clinical treatments into two linked assurance
cases. The first assurance case demonstrates the safety of the manufacturer's
device independent of the clinical treatment. The second demonstrates the
safety and clinical effectiveness of the device when it is used in a specific
clinical treatment. We introduce the idea of these separate assurance cases,
and describe briefly how they are separated and linked